An Islamic extremist, reported by the Norwegian police Mohyeldeen Mohammad was arrested this morning. He is accused of defending Norwegian politics Abid Raji from the Venstre party. A hearing is underway in the Oslo District Court.
He did not appear at the hearing in October
The case concerning Mohyeldeen Mohammad was originally scheduled to take place on October 22nd. However, the accused did not appear in court then. Last Saturday (November 10) he released a video saying he was unaware he had to appear in court on the first date. The trial therefore had to wait until the extremist was brought to trial, which was 4 weeks later.
Also read: Wredrock is back with new material >>>
Morning arrest
As reported by the Norwegian police, Mohyeldeen Mohammad he was arrested on Tuesday, November 13, early in the morning. At that time, he was praying in his private apartment in Oslo. According to the assurances of the press spokesman of the police - Thomas Blom - forcibly bringing the accused to the list was associated with the risk that he would not appear on the set date himself.
Mohammad had no intention of fleeing
According to assurances Mohyeldeen Mohammad, this time he wanted to appear at the Oslo District Court on time. To this end, he returned to Norway to be able to testify at the trial in which he appears as the accused. His defender also spoke in a similar vein - Brynjar Meling.
Also read: The first birthday of the U'MAMA restaurant >>>
He was not informed
In the previously mentioned recording, the extremist emphasized the fact that he had never received any summons stating that he was obliged to appear in court on October 22. “I was not aware that my presence was necessary at this hearing,” he says in the recording.
“Dirty Muslim”
Let's remind that Mohyeldeen Mohammad is responsible in court for naming the Norwegian politician Abida Rajah from the Venstre party "a dirty Muslim who should burn in hell." The accusation was brought by the deputy himself. It is worth emphasizing that Tuesday's hearing concerns whether the words spoken by the extremist were illegal and punishable, or whether they fall under broadly understood "freedom of speech."
[caldera_form id=”CF5b4dc9743b1e5″]